Statement of Facts vs Timeline
When a case calls for a high-level narrative, use StatementOfFactsPDF. When you need granular detail, switch to TimelineCourt.
Published February 6, 2025
Statements of fact and litigation timelines serve related but distinct purposes. This guide compares the formats so you can present the right level of detail to the court or your team.
When to use this
- You want to understand the strengths of StatementOfFactsPDF for briefs and motions.
- A paralegal is deciding whether to prepare a timeline or a narrative summary for a partner.
- You plan to use both formats and need guidance on how they complement each other.
How to do it (fast)
- Outline the audience: a judge, mediator, or internal team, and determine how much detail they expect.
- Draft a short narrative in StatementOfFactsPDF, focusing on key events and citations.
- Build the full chronology in TimelineCourt for deeper analysis, linking back to exhibits for reference.
Why this helps
- Helps you deploy the right tool for persuasive storytelling versus exhaustive documentation.
- Prevents duplication by clarifying what belongs in a statement of facts versus a timeline.
- Encourages consistent exhibit references across both documents.
Related tools
Not legal advice. Courts set their own rules. Keep your original records.